Harvey v. Fresno Traction Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Everts & Ewing, Short & Sutherland, and Carl E. Lindsay, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
Action to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff as a result of defendant’s negligence. Judgment for $750 followed a verdict in favor of plaintiff. The appeal is by defendant from an order of court made upon a statement of the case denying its motion for a new trial.
At the time of the alleged injury to plaintiff, defendant owned an electric railway upon which it, as a common carrier, operated cars between the city of Fresno and a station at its eastern terminus known as Sunny Side Vineyard, over which, in connection with a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burger v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- O'Mara v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Nilson v. Oakland Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Berry v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lagomarsino v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Hernandez v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ginochio v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- McGilvray v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Morrissey v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.