Legal Opinion
Robert Cooney v. Officer McJunkins and Officer Ball, each in their official and individual capacities
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided May 19, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00063Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ROBERT COONEY PLAINTIFF #108929 v. CASE NO. 4:25-CV-00063 JM OFFICER MCJUNKINS and OFFICER BALL, each in their official and individual capacities DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending is a motion for summary judgment filed by Conway Police Officers Jimmy McJunkins and Adam Ball. (Doc. No. 25). Plaintiff Robert Cooney, after being given an extension of time to file a response, did so on May 12, 2026. (Doc. No. 34). His response is one paragraph. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Randall Corwin v. City of Independence, MO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.