Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 23, 1992No. 91-CR-0014, 91-CR-0225; CA A72433, A72434PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant appeals from the denial, in part, of his motion for an order sealing the records of arrest and other official records arising from his prosecution. ORS 137.225.1 We affirm.
*323Defendant, a teacher, was charged with sexual abuse of a student. ORS 163.415. The prosecutor subsequently moved to dismiss that charge and then charged defendant with harassment. ORS 166.065. A jury acquitted defendant of the harassment charge and, after his acquittal, he moved for an order sealing the record of his arrest and other “official records” pursuant to ORS 137.225. The trial court initially ordered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. K. P.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. K. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. KPOregon Supreme Court · 1996