Legal Opinion
Malone v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1953No. S. F. 18752PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
In this proceeding in certiorari it appears that on November 5, 1951, applicant Elmer Delany filed in the superior court an “Application for Order Directing Testimonies and for Order Directing Subpoenae Duces Tecum” under sections 2083-2089 of the Code of Civil Procedure. No action is pending concerning the matters for which the testimony is sought; he seeks to perpetuate the testimony for a contemplated action.
In his application, he made no statement as to his interest or position, but that sufficiently appears later. (He is a duly elected Member of the Democratic County Central Committee in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Dingwall v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Railway Employees of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Smetherham v. Laundry Workers' Union, Local No. 75California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Providence Baptist Church v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bourne v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Wigoda v. CousinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Horner v. Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'n, Number 97California Court of Appeal · 1959
- O'NEILL v. LernerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977