Legal Opinion
Rogath v. Siebenmann
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1996No. 93 Civ. 7566 (DAB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
BATTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, David Rogath, brings this action against Defendant, Werner Siebenmann, for breach of contract, breach of warranty and fraud resulting from Plaintiffs purchase of a painting from the Defendant. Plaintiff now moves for leave to amend his Complaint and for partial summary judgment on the breach of warranty claims. Plaintiff also moves to compel a deposit of money with the Court pursuant to Rule 67 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Defendant’s Initial Involvement with the Painting
This case revolves around a painting, by a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- David Rogath, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. v. Werner E.R. Siebenmann, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Diamond v. Riverbend AptsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- HOME REVOLUTION, LLC v. JERRICK MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021