Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dinwiddie

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2007No. 06-5116PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

This habeas petition presents an unusual question of collateral estoppel. In 2000, Kip Antonio Smith was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor child. But only fourteen months earlier, in a civil deprived-child action, a jury had rejected the state’s allegations that he had sexually abused a child in a manner that was shocking and heinous or which caused severe harm or injury. In his state appeal, Smith unsuccessfully argued that the jury’s findings in the earlier civil proceeding precluded a contrary finding in his criminal case. See Smith v. Oklahoma, 46 P.3d 136, 137…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Early v. PackerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Byrd v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. HooleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Watkins v. GeneshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  4. State v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Sandel v. SandelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API