Legal Opinion
Burdick v. Bryant
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION of the court
Robert J. Stolarik, J.
This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding which seeks to review the granting of an area variance for a swimming pool by respondent Orangetown Historical Areas Board of Review.
Respondents oppose the application.
Petitioner owns property which is adjacent to that of respondents Kister. In July, 1969 the Town of Orangetown adopted Building Zone Local Law No. 3 (§312, col 8), which provides for a 30-foot side yard in an R-40 zoning district wherein the subject property is located. Pursuant to section 96-a of the General Municipal Law, the Town of Orangetown…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Colonial Beacon Oil Co. v. FinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Matter of Colonial Beacon Oil Co., Incorporated v. FinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rollins v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Academy Mews, Inc. v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988