Legal Opinion

Venne v. Damrow Bros.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

These air-pressure tanks were taken by Smith to defendant’s factory and left with the foreman, Rosenow, so that they might be taken apart and new inner linings placed therein. The defendant at that time did not manufacture or repair high-pressure tanks, but was engaged in manufacturing and repairing milk cans and tanks, gasoline tanks, and other similar articles. Smith testified that Rosenow was fully informed by him, when the tanks' were so left for repair, that they were used in the manufacture of root beer, an aerated product, and that they would be required in the process of manufacture…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howard v. Beldenville Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Voell v. KleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Brothers v. Bank of KaukaunaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Andrews v. RobertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Coakley v. Prentiss-Wabers Stove Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Johnson v. Associated Seed Growers, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lakeshore Commercial Finance Corp. v. Bradford Arms Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API