Legal Opinion

People v. Currie

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1928No. Docket No. 1028PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J., pro tem.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the superior court of Shasta County, upon an information charging him with the crime of rape, and also charging him with a prior conviction of a similar offense, the charging part of the information being as follows:

“The District Attorney of the County of Shasta, State of California, hereby accuses Steve Currie of a felony, to-wit: rape, in that the said Steve Currie on or about the 2nd day of December, 1927, at Ingot, in the County of Shasta, State of California, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously, have and accomplish an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RambaudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. People v. SachauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. O'DELLIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API