Legal Opinion

Robertson v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9520PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John I. Mullins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The defendant in error brought suit a,gainst the plaintiff in error upon a promissory note in the sum of $700.00, dated May 10, 1916.

The complaint sets forth a collateral agreement as attached to the note as follows:

“Having executed a promissory note, dated at Jackson, Tenn., on the 10th day of May, 1916, for $700.00, payable to the First National Bank of Jackson, Tenn., or order, six months after date, with interest from maturity at the rate of six per cent per annum, and being desirous of securing the same, and all my other liabilities actual and contingent, to said bank, or its assigns,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamberton v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  2. National Exchange Bank v. KilpatricSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Waldron v. MarcierIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Bonta v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
  5. Hall v. Junction RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Behlen Mfg. Co. v. First National Bank of EnglewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Walmer v. First Acceptance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Rock Island Plow Co. v. Cut Bank Implement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mulvihill v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API