Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Thompson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2000No. 67705-1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.

— In a personal restraint petition (PRP) filed more than one year after judgment became final, Petitioner Elijah Thompson seeks relief from his sentence on the basis that his criminal conduct occurred before the effective date of the statute creating the offense.

Because we find Petitioner’s judgment and sentence to be invalid on its face, his PRP is not barred from consideration by the one-year time limit of RCW 10.73.090. Petitioner’s plea agreement does not constitute a waiver of his right to complain of violations of the ex post facto and due process clauses of the state and federal…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of WestWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re Pers. Restraint of ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. GimarelliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Smith v. Whatcom County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API