Legal Opinion

Yost v. Eckart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 12, 1918No. Gen. No. 6,381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court,of La Salle county; the Hon. Edgab Eldredge, Judge, presiding. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

On August 31, 1914, Harold Yost, as administrator of the estate of Louis Eckart, deceased, recovered in the Circuit Court of La Salle county a judgment by confession against John Eckart upon a judgment note, which, omitting the power of attorney, is as follows: “$5,000.00. Mendota, Ill., May 25, 1912. 2 years after date, value received I promise to pay to John Eckart or order Five Thousand Dollars, at the....................with 4 per cent, interest per annum from Date.;*###•*###

John Eckart (Seal)

Per Nel Eckart (Seal)

P. O. Mendota, Ill.”

Thereafter John Eckart obtained an order of court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frankland v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bonner v. John GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Kayser v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Murphy v. SchochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. O'Connor v. MessengerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edward Thompson Co. v. HuntAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  2. Rice v. GoldsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API