Legal Opinion

Dann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 1, 1993No. 83PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

Appellants (plaintiffs below) contend that both their automobile insurance company and its agent breached a duty by failing to advise them that they could have obtained higher uninsured/underinsured coverage. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Thomas Ward, J.) disagreed, and, apparently finding as a matter of law that no such breach occurred, granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Appellants ask us to address a single question:

*44Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants[,] holding that the defendants had provided plaintiffs with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Porter v. General Boiler Casing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Cloninger v. National General InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fenwick Motor Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Tucker v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sadler v. Loomis Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API