Dann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
Appellants (plaintiffs below) contend that both their automobile insurance company and its agent breached a duty by failing to advise them that they could have obtained higher uninsured/underinsured coverage. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Thomas Ward, J.) disagreed, and, apparently finding as a matter of law that no such breach occurred, granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Appellants ask us to address a single question:
*44Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants[,] holding that the defendants had provided plaintiffs with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Porter v. General Boiler Casing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Cloninger v. National General InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Fenwick Motor Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Tucker v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sadler v. Loomis Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001