Legal Opinion

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen Insurance Department v. Pemberton

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1956No. 6 Div. 147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

Defendant, a fraternal insurance company, appeals from a judgment obtained upon its benefit certificate or insurance policy issued on the life of Roland G. Pemberton, payable to plaintiff, his wife, upon his death, the insured having died on December 25, 1953.

The pleas 19, 20 and 21, to which demurrer was sustained, allege that the policy is to be construed by the laws of Ohio as provided in the application for insurance and aver, “that under the law of the State of Ohio the following rule of law applied with respect to applications for insurance made to fraternal benefit…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Empire Life Insurance v. GeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Dawson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Cubbedge, Hazlehurst & Co. v. NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Battles v. Pierson Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Associated Doctors Health & Life Insurance v. HanksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. United Security Life Insurance Company v. SikesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen Ins. Dept., Inc. v. PembertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Battles v. Pierson Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API