Legal Opinion
Fransen v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 1, 2008No. Nos. 2008-CA-0076, 2008-CA-0087PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOLL, Justice.
_[iIn this case, we are called upon to decide whether an ordinance of the City of New Orleans for the collection of delinquent ad valorem taxes is a valid exercise of its plenary power under its home rule charter. The ordinance in question permits the City of New Orleans to place for collection with an attorney or collection agent delinquent ad valorem property taxes, to levy penalties, including a penalty to cover costs of collection by an attorney or collection agent, for delinquent ad valorem property taxes, and to sue to collect the delinquent tax. This case is before us…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Polk v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Cleco Evangeline v. Louisiana Tax Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Board of Directors v. All TaxpayersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jackson v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. MyersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Dean Born v. City of SlidellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Beer Industry League of Louisiana and Wine and Spirits Foundation of Louisiana, Inc. v. the City of New Orleans and Norman S. Foster, in His Official Capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Director of Finance for the City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.