Flowers v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

STEWART, Judge ad hoc.

The plaintiff appellant in her application for rehearing took issue with the following findings of fact in the opinion on the original hearing, viz.:(a) That the “defendant’s truck- -had traversed half the intersection before plaintiff entered” the intersection.(b) That the “plaintiff had ample time to observe defendant’s truck and take action to avoid the collision.” ‘ ■ . ' '(c) That “the corner was not -a blind corner.”

On the first point. First, let us see what the only witnesses,- who saw the collision, had to say, that is, the two drivers? and the helper in…