Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Darashinsky

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 3, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

I hold upon the evidence in this discovery proceeding that the moneys deposited in the joint savings bank account in the name of the decedent and the respondent, Jack Finkelstein, are the property of the estate and should be delivered to it. In reaching this conclusion I have considered and applied the rules laid down in three recent decisions of the Court of Appeals (Moskowitz v. Marrow, 251 N. Y. 380; Marrow v. Moskowitz, 255 id. 219, and Matter of Porianda, 256 id. 423). The documentary evidence *427with respect to the nature of the account and as to whether it was a joint account…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KelleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. In re RisinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API