Legal Opinion

Halbert v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 9, 1989No. 624-87CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

In this contract action, Mr. Richard Hal-bert, a New York dairy farmer (plaintiff), seeks money damages under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982). Plaintiff applied to participate in the Milk Diversion Program (Program) authorized by the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983 (Act), Pub.L. No. 98-180, 97 Stat. 1128 (1983). The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) denied the application. Plaintiff contends the denial was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. Defendant responds that the United States Claims Court lacks jurisdiction to decide plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Orchards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Atl, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API