Legal Opinion

Folse v. Dale

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 31, 1941No. 35605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The plaintiff, as the executrix of the succession of her husband, Alcide Daigle, filed suit against Mrs. Jennie Maestri Dale, wife of Arthur C. Dale, Arthur C. Dale, an interdict, through his curator, Rudolph Cruz, Lazare Maestri, as an interposed adjudicatee, the State of Louisiana, as the seizing creditor, the Recorder of Mortgages, the Clerk of the Civil District Court and the Constable of the First City Court, to be recognized as the assignee and owner of a certain judgment in favor of the Espoire Realty Company, Inc., against Mr. and Mrs. Arthur C. Dale, in solido, in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Charles F. Johnson & Co. v. BoiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  2. Sintes v. CommerfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Strudwick Funeral Home, Inc. v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Marshall v. Parish of MorehouseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  5. Hibernia Mortgage Co. v. GrecoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mahayna, Inc. v. Poydras Center Assoc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Harrelson v. HoganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Wax Lumber Co. v. LudeauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Sikes (Ch 7 Trustee) v. AFCO CREDIT CORPORATIONUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API