Legal Opinion
Cigna Insurance v. Oy Saunatec, Ltd.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 15, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-11787-PBSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (DOCKET 119)
SARIS, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) or, in the alternative, a motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59. The Court DENIES the motion (Docket No. 119).
The primary argument is that the plaintiffs claims for negligence and breach of warranty are barred by the three-year statutes of limitations applicable to negligence and tort-based warranty claims. See Mass.GemL. ch. 260, § 2A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- International Mobiles Corp. v. Corroon & Black/Fairfield & Ellis, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Cannon v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Irving M. Levin, Etc. v. David R. BerleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cigna Insurance v. OY Saunatec, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001