Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided June 5, 1998No. IP 98-0266-C B/SPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING TEE UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion strike the United States’ motion to dismiss and its jurisdictional arguments on standing and ripeness, Defendants’ motion to dismiss, the United States’ motion to dismiss and Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Plaintiffs motion to strike, grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss,…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gillespie v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Bishop v. United States ex rel. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2014
- United States v. Kirk J. LewitzkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Cambridge Electronics Corp. v. MGA Electronics, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Gillespie v. City Of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.