Legal Opinion

Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. Huff

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1900No. 1596Published

Appeal from the District Court of Chaffee County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. A. R. Gumaer was the vice president and general manager of the Florence Oil and Refining Company, and William H. Huff was the secretary and treasurer of the same company. The office of the company was in Denver. Mr. Gumaer had the entire control and management of the company’s affairs, and it was the duty of Mr. Huff, in all matters pertaining to the business of the company, to act under the orders, and follow the directions of Mr. Gumaer. In 1892, Mr. Huff loaned the company $1,500, and, from time to time afterwards, until February, 1895, loaned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hirsch v. FeeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Sisk v. HurstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Wood v. BarkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  5. Hopkins v. McGillicuddySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API