Hirsch v. Feeney
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lambert Tree, Judge, presiding. This was an action on the case, by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages for a malicious prosecution.
1Opinion of the Court
Hr. Justice Walker
delivered the opinion of the Court:
■ It is objected that the finding of the jury and the judgment of the court were wrong, because there was probable cause for the arrest, and there was a want of malice. These were facts for the finding of the jury, under proper instructions; and we think the instructions presented the legal questions arising on the evidence fairly to the jury. In fact, no exceptions are taken to those given, but it is urged that the court erred in refusing to give instructions asked for appellant. We fail to see any error in refusing them. The court had no…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Eastman v. Leiser Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Lindquist v. Friedman's Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Stueber v. Admiral Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. HuffColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.