Legal Opinion

United States v. Rains

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2010No. 09-50724PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Following a jury trial, Michael Rains and David Aldridge were found guilty of various crimes related to the manufacture and sale of methamphetamine. Rains challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s finding that he was in an agreement to manufacture methamphetamine, the weight involved, and his intent to distribute. Aldridge argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress and in enhancing his sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) based on a prior conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

I

Rains and Aldridge were members of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jose Davila v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Ingrid Fisher v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. NPR Investments, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Roach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. State v. Jessica MorrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  5. United States v. RadleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API