Legal Opinion

Regents of University of Michigan v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 12, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04913Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF Case No. 22-cv-04913-AMO MICHIGAN, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING STAY 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 81 10 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS 11 CORPORATION, Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s motion to stay the 14 case pending inter partes review (“IPR”). The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision 15 without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for February 22, 2024, is VACATED. See 16 Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Slip Track Systems, Inc. And Todd A. Brady v. Metal Lite, Inc., Thomas R. Herren and Gene N. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Rogers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1946
  5. Carpenters Industrial Council v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API