Legal Opinion

D'AURIA v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1999No. S98A2002PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Ralph D’Auria was charged with the offense of sexual battery under OCGA § 16-6-22.1 in an accusation filed by the State in February 1993. The accusation was amended in May 1993 to reflect the victim’s married name. In April 1995, D’Auria filed a plea in bar based on the statute of limitation, a plea in bar based on double jeopardy, and a demurrer based on the alleged unconstitutionality of OCGA § 16-6-22.1. After a complicated procedural history, D’Auria now appeals from the trial court’s denial of his statute of limitation and constitutional challenges.

OCGA § 16-6-22.1 (b)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. McCrary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Broski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. England v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. State v. WyattSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. State v. BairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Slinkard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API