Legal Opinion

LEANNAH v. Alliant Energy Corp.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 26, 2009No. 2:07-cr-00169Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.

After years of allowing early retirees to pay the same health care premiums as active employees, defendant, Alliant Energy Corp. (“Alliant”), like so many other companies struggling with the soaring cost of healthcare, sought to reduce these costs by requiring early retirees to pay a higher premium than active employees. IBEW Local Union 965 (“the Union”), which represents Alliant’s unionized workers, took exception to this disparity, as did the named plaintiffs, who are among the retirees affected by this change. Plaintiffs, therefore, filed suit on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Kenneth P. Bidlack v. Wheelabrator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Frank M. Rosetto, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons v. Pabst Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API