Legal Opinion
Neelon v. Hirsh & Renner, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 29, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
These are two actions of tort to recover damages for personal injuries, received by the plaintiff on February 27, 1922, while riding as a passenger for hire in a seven-passenger automobile, driven by the defendant Krantz on Lincoln Street in Medway; the automobile collided with a telephone pole, located about two feet from the side of the highway, thus causing the plaintiff to be thrown forward from her position on the front seat against the windshield. The impact stopped the automobile with an abrupt, violent shock, and it could not proceed on its own power. Lincoln Street had no sidewalks.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Shepard v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Pyyny v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Commonwealth v. BoraskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Centrello's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Marsh v. BeraldiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of Eastern MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Reardon v. Coleman Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Mahoney v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.