Legal Opinion
John F. Woodham v. Atlanta Development Authority
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1034; A15A1035PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Judge.
These related appeals arise from an attempt by Atlanta Development Authority (the Authority) to conduct discovery in connection with collecting a judgment against attorney John F. Woodham and Citizens for Ethics in Government, LLC (“Citizens”). Woodham represents himself pro se and also represents Citizens.
Woodham is the sole appellant in Case No. A15A1034. He challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to recuse, but his motion did not meet the threshold requirements of Uniform Superior Court Rule 25.3; accordingly, we affirm that ruling. He also challenges the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayor of Savannah v. Batson-Cook Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Lue, Mayor v. EadySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Horn v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Gude v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Considine v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MONDY v. MAGNOLIA ADVANCED MATERIALS, INCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- John F. Woodham v. the Atlanta Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018