Legal Opinion

State v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 2005No. CR 04-1300PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Gunter, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the State from the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s order granting Harold Jerome Kelley’s motion to suppress. The State contends that evidence seized during an inventory pursuant to the impoundment of Kelley’s car for failure to provide proof of insurance was lawful, and that the circuit court erred in granting Kelley’s motion to suppress it. We agree with the circuit court, and affirm its order suppressing the evidence.

These are the relevant facts. While patrolling an area in Southwest Little Rock on October 16, 2003, Little Rock police…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Flippo v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Matthew Elliot CohaganIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. City of Farmington v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API