Legal Opinion

Cratch v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1962No. 22PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The assignments of error purport to be supported by exceptions which appear nowhere in the record except in the purported assignments of error. Such exceptions are ineffective and will not be considered on appeal. Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118. Even so, in the absence of any exceptions, or when exceptions have not been preserved in accordance with the requirements of our Rules, the appeal will be taken as an exception to the judgment. An exception to the signing of the judgment presents nothing for review except whether or not the court’s conclusion of law is supported by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Logan v. SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. LampkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Dilday v. Beaufort County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Clark Equipment Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. RorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API