Legal Opinion

Murphy v. National Paving Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

From the preceding statement of facts it appears that the defendant surety company is attempting to recover from the impleaded defendant the Badger State Bank the amount it paid the plaintiff Murphy, a subcontractor on public work to whom it was liable on the contractor’s bond given to secure performance of the contract, in satisfaction of his claim against the contractor, on the ground that the bank took payment of a debt owed by the contractor to the bank from a deposit by the contractor of a fund known by the bank to be impressed with a trust for the benefit of laborers and materialmen.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lancaster Co. Nat. Bank's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Theiler v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Danischefsky v. Klein-Watson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Schneider Fuel & Supply Co. v. West Allis State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In the Matter of Paul E. Thomas, Charlene S. Thomas, D/B/A Thomas Landscaping Company, Thomas Landscaping Company, Inc., Bankrupts. Appeal of Joseph Lorenz, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. National Surety Corp. v. State National Bank of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Simonson v. Mc InvailleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API