Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Perry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1925No. 15147PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

At the threshold of this case the court is confronted by the question whether on the merits of the ease there is.any question remaining for decision othqr than an abstract and moot question of law disconnected with any relief or remedy. This question is raised by a motion of defendants to dismiss.

This action was commenced solely for in-junctive relief. No other judgment was sought than that of a permanent injuncth n. Upon the filing of plaintiffsr petition, and in the absence of the district judge from the county, the county judge granted a temporary injunction on October…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCullough v. GilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Parrish v. School Dist. No. 19Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Reynolds v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. George v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Jones v. EastSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watchorn v. General Finance & Sales Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Exchange Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Moore v. City of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Resler v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Egolf v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API