Legal Opinion

St. Marks Assets, Inc. v. Herzog

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 3, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order and final judgment entered April 26, 2002 affirmed, with $25 costs.

*113The duly credited trial evidence supports Civil Court’s determination that respondent is entitled to succeed to the rent-controlled tenancy of the departed tenant as a nontraditional family member (New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations [9 NYCRR] § 2204.6 [d] [3]). In this regard, the record shows that the parties enjoyed a family-type relationship dating back to 1979, and that they held themselves out as a couple, vacationing together and visiting their respective families. The tenant…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Arnie Realty Corp. v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. 54 Featherco Inc. v. CorreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fort Washington Holdings, LLC v. AbbottAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
  2. 530 Second Ave. Co., LLC v. ZenkerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API