Legal Opinion
In Re Novartis Wage and Hour Litigation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 6, 2010No. Docket 09-0437-cvPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated class actions, the plaintiffs, current or former pharmaceutical sales representatives employed by defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis”), appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Paul A. Crotty, Judge, denying their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA” or the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and state law, for overtime pay with respect to time worked in excess of 40 hours per week. The district court granted Novartis’s motion for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Avraham Gold v. New York Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Flood v. Just Energy Mktg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.