Legal Opinion

Robinson v. INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 7, 1981No. 226-80PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

By his amended complaint the plaintiff, a Vermont dealer and distributor, sought damages essentially contractual in nature from his Florida supplier, International Industries Limited, Inc. He also joined Forenta, Inc., a Delaware corporation manufacturing in Tennessee the product complained of as defective, and Carlisle Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation which supplied for the product tires claimed to be defective. The product claimed defective was a Hand-I-Tow towing unit, several of which were purchased by plaintiff from International, and by International’s direction shipped directly,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Victor Surpitski v. Hughes-Keenan Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. Davis v. Saab-Scania of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  5. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northern Aircraft, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. v. Coronet Priscilla Ice Cream Corp.District Court, D. Vermont · 1996
  3. Messier v. Whitestown Packing Corp.District Court, D. Vermont · 1982
  4. Artec Distributing, Inc. v. Video Playback, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1992
  5. Warshow v. Crompton Corp.Vermont Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API