Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Vocera Communications, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TENAHA LICENSING LLC, ) Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No.19-208-LPS-SRF VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant. ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action for patent infringement, arguing that the asserted patent claims are ineligible under
35 U.S.C. § 101
because they are directed to an abstract idea. (D.I. 8)! Defendant also argues that the Complaint’s allegations of indirect patent infringement are insufficient and should be dismissed. (D.I. 9 at 19-20) As…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.