Legal Opinion

Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Vocera Communications, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 2, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00208Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TENAHA LICENSING LLC, ) Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No.19-208-LPS-SRF VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant. ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action for patent infringement, arguing that the asserted patent claims are ineligible under

35 U.S.C. § 101

because they are directed to an abstract idea. (D.I. 8)! Defendant also argues that the Complaint’s allegations of indirect patent infringement are insufficient and should be dismissed. (D.I. 9 at 19-20) As…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API