DeLaperriere v. Williams
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. The conveyance from the husband to petitioner and from the latter to the wife of the former were fraudulently executed, because made to delay, hinder, and defraud the creditors of the husband, and the petitioner participated in the fraud. In these circumstances the court of equity will not help the petitioner to cancel such deed or to avoid its effect by showing that it was fraudulent. If two parties confederate for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of one of them, and in pursuance thereof the debtor executes and delivers a deed conveying land to the other, and procures the grantee…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Smith v. GettingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
- Griffin v. SketoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Ansley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DeLaPerriere v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932