RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1ConcurrenceAnderson, Justice
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the City did not act arbitrarily or capriciously by denying the conditional use permit as “injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or otherwise harm[ful to] the public health, safety and welfare.” I am not impressed with the strength of the City’s argument, and am particularly struck by the willingness of the City to ignore the long-standing use of the property by RDNT, a use that predates the arrival of the neighbors now complaining about traffic. That said, given our deferential standard of review, I would affirm on the grounds advanced by the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington Heights, and Village of Mount Prospect and Forest View Civic Association, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Urrutia v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.