Legal Opinion

DeFunis v. Odegaard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1974No. 42198PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

— In DeFunis v. Odegaard, 82 Wn.2d 11, 507 P.2d 1169 (1973), the minority admissions policy of the law school of the University of Washington was challenged upon equal protection grounds. We upheld the policy. Marco DeFunis, Jr. (hereafter referred to as plaintiff), sought review of our decision by the United States Supreme Court. Plaintiff’s petition for certiorari was granted. Following submission of the cause, the Supreme Court determined that the controversy as between the parties had become moot, vacated our judgment, and remanded the cause to this court. The per curiam opinion rendered…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bakke v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Johnston v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API