State v. Urias
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This is a sentence review. The defendant-appellant, Frank Paul Urias, challenges the district court’s order relinquishing its retained jurisdiction and denying probation, the order denying Urias’ request to be transported to the hearing on his Rule 35 motion, and the amended judgment of conviction, entered after consideration of Urias’ motion for reduction of sentence. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural Background
Based upon evidence that he gave cocaine to three young men, Urias was charged with and pled guilty to delivery of a controlled…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SommerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. KnutsenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. RobertsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. Sasha Dee MartinezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013