Legal Opinion

Van Berkel v. Fox Farm and Road MacHinery

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1984No. Civ. 3-83-1118PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

DEVITT, District Judge.

The principal issue here, occasioned by defendants’ motion for summary judgment and for reimbursement of costs and attorneys fees, is whether plaintiff’s attorney acted within proper professional standards when he instituted this products liability case, and later when he refused to dismiss it upon learning that all the claims were time barred by statutes of limitations.

Plaintiff is a Minnesota farmer who lost his right arm in a farm accident on September 6, 1976 while using a corn chopper manufactured, sold and distributed by defendant foreign…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Kimber v. Federal Financial Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1987
  4. Sunamerica Financial Corp. v. BonhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. In Re DinovaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API