Legal Opinion

Lallman v. Hovey

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1895Published

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by George Lallman and Charles Palmer against Theron Hovey and Belle Hovey. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The defendants are husband and wife. The plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of the husband, seek to set aside, as fraudulent against his creditors, conveyances of real property and a bill of sale of personal property made by him to the other defendant. After the commencement of the action, an order of the court was made to allow William P. Sherman, another judgment creditor of the defendant Theron Hovey, to come in as a party-plaintiff. The action was founded upon an alleged judgment recovered in justice’s court by the original plaintiffs and docketed in the county clerk’s office. Sherman’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edmeston v. LydeNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Jackson v. FrierNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Partridge v. BadgerNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Jackson ex dem. Witherell & Hyde v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  5. Moore v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API