Legal Opinion

Nautilus Marine, Inc. v. James Niemela John O'Hara Ocean Beauty Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, in Personam M/v Norquest

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1999No. 97-35516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

In this admiralty appeal, we must decide whether the rule of Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303, 48 S.Ct. 134, 72 L.Ed. 290 (1927), applies to an allegedly intentional or reckless tort to the property of a third person, which causes loss to the plaintiff only because of a contractual relationship, unknown to the tortfeasor, that the plaintiff had with the injured party. Nautilus Marine, Inc., appeals from the district court's summary judgment denying its claim for lost profits arising from damage that the defendant caused to vessels chartered by Nautilus.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Union Oil Company v. James J. Oppen and John J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Barber Lines A/s v. M/v Donau MaruCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Carbone v. Ursich the Del RioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
  2. Veracruz v. BP, P.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. In Re the Complaint of Pride Offshore, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  4. In re: Deepwater HorizonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  5. Thorco Projects A/S v. Nutrion Feeds North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API