Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salt Lake City v. Valdez-Sadler

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 18, 2015No. 20140061-CAPublished

1DissentChristiansen, Judge

17 I respectfully dissent because I disagree with the majority's conclusion that the City failed to present evidence sufficient to convict Valdez-Sadler of obstruction of justice. In my view, the plain language of the obstruction-of-justice statute is unambiguous, and the actions taken by Valdez-Sadler clearly fall within the statute's reach,. Accordingly, I would hold that the trial court correctly denied Valdez-Sadler's motion for directed verdict in this case.

118 The obstruction-of-justice statute is broadly worded and eriminalizes "harborling] or conceal[ing] a person" or "provid{ing]…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Allisen v. American Legion Post No. 134Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. HuntUtah Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API