Salt Lake City v. Valdez-Sadler
Court of Appeals of Utah
1DissentChristiansen, Judge
17 I respectfully dissent because I disagree with the majority's conclusion that the City failed to present evidence sufficient to convict Valdez-Sadler of obstruction of justice. In my view, the plain language of the obstruction-of-justice statute is unambiguous, and the actions taken by Valdez-Sadler clearly fall within the statute's reach,. Accordingly, I would hold that the trial court correctly denied Valdez-Sadler's motion for directed verdict in this case.
118 The obstruction-of-justice statute is broadly worded and eriminalizes "harborling] or conceal[ing] a person" or "provid{ing]…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Allisen v. American Legion Post No. 134Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HuntUtah Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.