Legal Opinion

Berry v. Pierce

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 9, 1983No. S-78-33-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JUSTICE, Chief Judge.

On this 11th day of February, 1983, came on for consideration the motion of Rita M. Vinson to intervene in this action as a plaintiff and class representative, and the motion of the defendant to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment.

The proper disposition of these motions hinges upon a conversancy with the past procedural history in this case.

I

On February 15, 1978, Charlene Berry and Virginia Winker filed a class action complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a), and Executive Order No. 11478, 34…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Theard v. United States ArmyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  2. In re Wells Fargo Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation (No. III)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  3. FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API