Legal Opinion

Bucholz v. Harthun

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1931No. File No. 5966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate a judgment. The first question arises on a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the statement of the case was not settled in the time prescribed by statute. The statute does not fix any specified time in which the statement of the case must be settled. Section 7655 provides that: “within thirty days after the notice of the entry of judgment or the order to be reviewed, or such further time as the court shall allow. . . .” In other words, the statute fixes thirty days and then provides such other time as the court may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Northern Pacific RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Jesse French & Sons Piano Co. v. GettsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Harris v. HessinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Peterson v. FinneganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Schriock v. SchriockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Muhlhauser v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Viall v. Triangle Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API