Legal Opinion

The People v. Rothe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1934No. 22566. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shaw

The plaintiffs in error, Alex Rothe and Andrew Cannizzaro, (hereinafter called the defendants,) were indicted in the criminal court of Cook county on a charge of robbery while armed with a deadly weapon. They were convicted, sentenced to the penitentiary, and now prosecute this writ of error to review that judgment.

The evidence for the People tended to prove that the defendants attempted to sell whisky to a man by the name of Randall Prieve, who operated a cigar store at Fifty-ninth street and Wentworth avenue, in the city of Chicago, and that in pursuit of this purpose they decoyed him into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. The People v. BlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. GardinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. The People v. RongettiIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. McMullenIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. ThompkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. HolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. The People v. BeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. LegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API