Schauman v. Solmica Midwest, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This appeal involves the question of whether a contract between plaintiffs, Gilbert Schauman and Janette Schauman, husband and wife, and defendant Solmica Midwest Inc. was usurious.
It appears that on October 27, 1966, plaintiffs entered into a “Contract and Guarantee” with defendant Solmica for the application of aluminum siding on a home owned by plaintiffs. The contract provided that the cash price for the work was $3,200 and the credit price therefor was $4,879.56, payable in 84 monthly installments of $58.09 each, commencing January 25, 1967. Title to the materials was to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Kettwig v. Aero Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- United Realty Trust v. Property Development & Research Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Dietz v. Phipps (In Re Sunde)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.