Legal Opinion

Schauman v. Solmica Midwest, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1969No. 41282PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This appeal involves the question of whether a contract between plaintiffs, Gilbert Schauman and Janette Schauman, husband and wife, and defendant Solmica Midwest Inc. was usurious.

It appears that on October 27, 1966, plaintiffs entered into a “Contract and Guarantee” with defendant Solmica for the application of aluminum siding on a home owned by plaintiffs. The contract provided that the cash price for the work was $3,200 and the credit price therefor was $4,879.56, payable in 84 monthly installments of $58.09 each, commencing January 25, 1967. Title to the materials was to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Kettwig v. Aero Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. United Realty Trust v. Property Development & Research Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Dietz v. Phipps (In Re Sunde)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API