Legal Opinion

Art Aguilar and Marisol Aguilar v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 4, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00913Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ART AGUILAR and MARISOL AGUILAR, Case No. 3:24-cv-00913-JR Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATION HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Defendants. _____________________________________ RUSSO, U.S. Magistrate Judge: Plaintiffs Art Aguilar and Marisol Aguilar move to file an amended complaint against defendant Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ motion should be granted. STANDARDS Pursuant to Rule 15, leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States of America, Exrel., Insoon Lee v. Smithkline Beecham, Inc. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API